So, did the first 120 pages of the book through and I'm thrilled! Is written really great ... 've Also found 2 very good text for the blog ;-)
first Karen Duve of the "cheap mass-produced animal"
"Back in the 50s, many nutritionists believe that meat could never be a cheap mass-produced until a new level of ruthlessness. and ruthlessness made it possible that meat consumption was in the western industrial nations for all income groups were becoming commonplace - the coop up of cattle, pigs, chickens and turkeys to the limits of what is possible, the import of fattening food from countries that their crops eingentlich quite well for their own malnourished people could have used, and a breeding selection, which did not seek more healthy, capable of reproducing animal, but a winged monster with orthopedic problems "
second Karen Duve on the opposition of organic meat and animal welfare.:
"But even with the best attitude, the shortest transport to the slaughterhouse and the most humane slaughter I stand for organic meat in front of a logical contradiction. If it is not okay to abuse animals, how can it be ok to them kill? That is far worse than to torment only. The procedure in industrial factory farming is conclusive. If I have already been systematically ignored the needs of an animal when pigs for me chop plantations only, then it is only a small step to give them one in front of the bulb. Animal welfare in order to slaughter the animal at some point, is a contradiction in terms.
I respect the need for an animal care after exercise and fresh air, sufficient resting places, the right food and the opportunity to socialize, throw him a ball to play in the spout, but the most basic of his needs, the will to live, ignore I just . to block An animal in a narrow cage is in the public kill, but is okay - or what? And vice versa: If you need the main interest of an animal to live his best interest to pay no attention, why would you then feel through its downstream interests committed to something? If it is not a crime to kill an animal, why should it be a crime be to keep it in narrow confinement to cut him a curly tail, or half the bill or him to move to a laboratory a number of teeth to replace the teeth with implants and the implants will become infected on purpose, and eaten by the bacteria half the jaw bone have? If a pig anyway is there to be killed, why should not you try a few before Dum-dum bullets in it? When I accept his death, I agree with basically everything else. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment